Was This Atlantis?
Examination of the possible location and the reason of its disappearance.
Version Française.
Ancient Egypt, cultural heritage of Atlantis?
We
all know about ancient Egypt with their mummies, pharaohs and
pyramids. Their cultural advance, where did it came from? Their
culture, would it not be a cultural legacy of Atlantis? Both Plato,
in his dialogues of Timaeus and Critias, and Cayce in his readings,
had reported that the Atlantean population had contact with Egyptian
culture. They even mentioned that the Atlanteans fleeing their
continent, had joined among others Egypt, taking with them their
culture and a large number of documents. That's what the Egyptian
priests confirmed 9'000 years later to Solon. They had confirmed to
Solon that they were having papyrus on what they had said. These
documents exist certainly no more today, as
the library of Alexandria was destroyed twice. It may well be that
contact with the Atlantean culture explains the miracle of the
Egyptian culture, which remains an enigma to this day. The Egyptians
had a considerable technological, scientific and medical knowledge.
This contact with the culture of Atlantis could also explain the
sociological puzzle, the pyramids and megaliths, were they part of
the Atlantean legacy? Has Egypt had, without really tending to do
so, taken on her the mission to extend the tradition of Atlantis up
to this day? We find, in effect, traces of these traditions among
the ancient Greeks and, even when you disagree on this, among the
Templars, alchemists, Masons and even the Rose-cross.
We must not forget the strange cultural similarities of certain
populations. Moreover, it are precisely these people among which we
find these strange similarities, where Atlanteans fled during the
destruction of their island. We also have pyramids among the
Mexicans. There was also a mummy, or even mummies, among North
American Indians, which has an age of at least nine to ten thousand
years. These Indians had, like the ancient Egyptians, a mania of
inducing their bodies and their graves with red ocher. It's because
this mania that we gave the North American Indians the nickname “Red
Skins”. We must not forget the Guanches of the Canary
Islands, the Basques and the Berbers having traditions and languages
totally alien to their cultural and geological environment. It's
highly probable that these populations would be a cultural memory of
Atlantis, as were the Egyptians. The places where these people live,
is according to Plato and Cayce there where once the Atlantean people
had fled.
The archaeologist and man of contemporary art “Sean
Suchy” had put, in his book “L'Archéologie
d'avant l'histoire (The Archeology prior to history)” (Éditions Laffont), the Egyptian constructions in a global context.
He writes:
« ...How machining blocks of several hundred tons comparable to those of
trilithon of Balbeck, or huge masses of granite of the sepulchral
chamber of Giza is a performance inaccessible to the most
sophisticated technology of our civilization... »
Then he continues:
« ...So the adjustment of the blocks which is made with perfection to the
heaviest of them as the lightest, so it's not possible, following the
example commonly referred to slide a razor blade between the elements
of columns of the Parthenon, blocks of Giza, or the Inca walls, this
adjustment would not successfully be achieved by means of our technology... »
Scientists of today believe, based on repeated measurements and
calculations on the spot, that builders of the pyramids of Egypt
could never have build the pyramids without technology superior to
ours. The reason they advance is very simple the one where we say;
“We don't know how to do so and therefore it's impossible
that someone else knew, or would have known.” But is it
reasonable to think so? Shouldn't we, perhaps, put ourselves in
place of an ordinary worker and ask how he would have done it. It's
in fact that what has been achieved by some; an archaeologist,
practicing experimental archeology, succeeded
to successfully demonstrate that one could build a wall, as the Incas
did, in using simple terms. It's a television crew filming in Egypt
who did the same kind of experience which was presented on “Le
Cinq” (French cultural channel) and TLC.
They had actually asked a dozen illiterate Egyptian workers to put a
block of granite weighing several tons on a march of a pyramid. They
expected to see techniques as we know them, with a ramp, ropes and so
on. But the workers themselves didn't need this all and had, by
means with a disconcerting simplicity, raised the block weighing
several tons in a space of no more then forty minutes. We can
therefore conclude that these workers had, in despite the fact that
they were illiterate, yet in them the knowledge of the Atlanteans,
which we definitely have not, or no more. These same workers also
knew how to carve a block out of a wall; it was pretty simple, if you
knew how to do so! We can see that some people have indeed kept a
part of culture and knowledge of Atlantis, even if this know-how has
been diluted over time. Perhaps we should conclude that if certain
things are not possible with our technology, that this is not a
matter of impossibility, but that it are our technological
capabilities that are not adapted as required.
Both Plato and Cayce have said that some Atlanteans had managed
to flee to different countries, including ancient Egypt. It's an
Arab historian of the ninth century, who spoke of hidden chambers in
the pyramids. He is pretending that a pyramid of Egypt has been
built three centuries before the flood. The date of construction
indicated by the historian brings us, considering that they once
believed that the flood took place about twenty-five centuries before
Christ, to the time when the great pyramids of Giza were built. The
date of construction matches quite well with what have left us Egypt
in hieroglyphics, which were indecipherable in the ninth century.
The Arab historian relates that the pyramid contained vaults filled
with talismans, strange objects, instruments of iron and weapons that
will not rust, models of vessels in clay, glass that can bend without
breaking...! It's clear that these objects had been placed there by
a previous civilization that has not only known stainless steel, but
also a material that resembles the plastic of today.
Apart from citations of the Arab historian of the ninth century,
there is also chronic literate from Al Massoudi of the tenth century.
He also mentions in his chronicles the existence of underground
chambers located on or near the Great Pyramids, from which he said
what was there:
« ...A treasure that no human imagination can evaluate or even conceive... »
« ...An old legend tells that it was brought in Egypt long ago by our
ancestors who were of a higher level and lived on the other side of
the sea... »
« ...A treasure that contains the rarest and most precious stones... »
« ...The wonders of the high science inherited from our ancestors, prodigious
instruments that increase the dimensions and powers of man, which
enable him to measure time, forecast the future, flying in the air,
move in water as easily as on Earth... »
What is interesting is that Cayce also had alluded to the fact that Atlantis
had concealed documents, scrolls and other sacred literature in a
place he called “Hall Of Records”, not to be
confused with a place where we keep and sell musical records and DVD
or a registration hall of an airport. The term “Hall Of
Records” is rather a “Archives Room” and
is to be seen as such. According to Cayce, the “Hall of
Records” would not be discovered yet, because the
Atlanteans appear to have taken care to hide their treasures, so that
it becomes unlikely that their papers be desecrated by those who
would not be able to understand their importance. These assertions
of Cayce pushed some to say that the great pyramid of Giza was not
built to two thousand five hundred years before Christ, but that it
dated from 10'500 to 10'400 years before Christ. Cayce's assertions
are reason for some to believe that the pyramid is much older than
two thousand five hundred years before Christ. But another reason
which leads some to believe that, could be that the pyramid contains
a small tunnel that points to a place where Cirrus was 10'500 years
before Christ. But it may be necessary to separate two things, the
date of construction and the date to which this small tunnel points.
The Egyptians had perhaps a reason of the pointing there, just as
they had done with the famous zodiac of Denderah, which includes a
sign, a lion in a boat, and also indicates a date of about a thousand
years later, ie 9792 years before Christ.
The place that the Atlanteans had finally chosen for their “Hall
of Records”, which was used as a storage place for their
esoteric, religious, scientific knowledge and their laws, was once
the very fertile plateau of Giza. This plateau was even known at the
time of Atlantis to have been able to withstand multiple deluges,
floods and earthquakes. They also believed that there was
approximately the mathematical center of all continents and land and
that this “Hall of Records” would be less
disturbed by future earthquakes and floods. This “Hall of
Records” was locked in his own pyramid, which was to remain
hidden for thousands of years. This pyramid is to be found between
the Sphinx and Great Pyramid. From the right paw of the Sphinx, we
should find an entry that would give access to this “Hall of
Records.” This access should be discovered only then when
mankind would have reached a high enough spiritual level, at the
beginning of the fifth era.
If there was a cultural legacy of Atlantis in Egypt, it would be
in the form of religion that it once had. Although we have very
little information about the religions of Atlantis, we can get an
image by reading that what Plato and Cayce have left us. We should
not consider the writings of Plato and the Cayce readings as
contradictory but as complementary. Plato's writings are themselves
a rather comprehensive description, without going into details of
individual people. While all the readings of Cayce are primarily a
mosaic of life experiences of people taken individually making an
overview difficult.
We can, by putting the two next to each other, get us a better
idea of life on this country that was once Atlantis. The first
impression that this information gives us is that Atlantis seems to
have had just as ancient Egypt, two religions. But yes, the ancient
Egyptians did have two religions, a polytheistic religion, that of
the pharaohs and the ruling classes, then a monotheistic religion
practiced by the lower classes of the Egyptian society, which were
mainly the Hebrews. Atlantis had apparently experienced a similar
situation, where the polytheistic religion was called “Sons
of Belial” and were forming the core of the ruling classes
and those who held power, then the class of workers and peasants
belonged rather to the “Children of the Law of One.”
Cayce also says in his reading 1007-3, that the “Children
of the Law of One” would be nothing other than the
ancestors of the Jewish population. The “Sons of Belial”,
they, used their religious and spiritual doctrine especially for
their own material benefit, as this was the case at the time of the
pharaohs. Another similarity is the treatment of lower classes,
because the Atlantean society was as ancient Egypt, divided into
classes. The most disadvantaged classes, workers and peasants, were
not even treated as humans, we treated them as “things”,
a class of untouchables, as in India today. Although the Egyptians
did not know slaves until the invasion of their country by Alexander
the Great, the fate of their lower classes wasn't much better. It's
just if not treated like animals. The “Children of the Law
of One” (the ancestors of the Jewish people) did not know
the best treatment during their existence on Atlantis, where they
were called “things”, which leaves a bad omen of
the treatment which was reserved for them. The worst was reserved
for children from mixed marriages. Rejected by both camps, these
children were really treated like animals.
We don't have up to day written evidence of that this happened in the
same way in ancient Egypt, but it could be expected to be so.
Another similarity that ancient Egypt shares with Latin America is
that religions have as their supreme god the Sun. The “Children
of the Law of One” worshiped at the time also the Sun,
except that the “Children of the Law of One” did
not know this whole range of sub-gods, assistant gods, half gods and
so on. This notion of the Sun god appears to have disappeared during
their stay in Egypt, to be replaced by the term “God” we
know so far. We find both in the Cayce readings, as in the old
Egyptian documents, the names of a Sun god, whose name most often
cited was the name “Ra” or “Ra-Ta”, but also
“Re”, although the Egyptians
called him usually “Aton”.
|